![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
January 14, 2004
semantic redundancy
Last night, I was driving around in a snowstorm, trying to think of a new name for our desktop product. The name game can drive you nuts. It's best to think of it as a game you play for fun, like Concentration or Password. There's a continuum of obviousness when it comes to naming products. Years ago, when trying to name an EDI engine that translates medical records between different databases, my manager insisted on "InfoServer" as a name. I had to go over his head, taking my name, "Rosetta", to his boss before they went with it. At worst, names are mere strings of cliches, like "ShareComm Pro". At best, names merely suggest their intent, like "Google" or "Jabber" or "Tivo". A few "convey the intent" names we considered last night include: Hourglass, Keepsake, Legacy, Shoebox, Affinity. These were all taken. Some had registered software trademarks, some were domains with too much mindshare, some were connected to big scary companies like Hallmark. Finding names like this is usually just a matter of trawling through Roget's Thesaurus, reading the concepts you're trying to convey. Other names have nothing to do with their intent, like "Java" or "Apple". These names need to be friendly and cool, particularly for consumer products. This is why we liked "Akimbo" so much, and why the ReplayTV guy liked it too. Akimbo's got enough meaning for logo purposes (as in Java), but people don't have to know what it means to be drawn to it. Names like this are harder to find. You need an ear for it. With Akimbo, I simply woke one morning with my legs angled like a frog, and I thought "Akimbo! Now that's a good name." This is usually how it goes. Once you finally find a name you like, you do a Google search, then a domain search, then a trademark search. It's amazing how similiar people are when it comes to naming things, which can get discouraging unless you "think different" (like everyone else). Deliberately setting out to find a name can drive you bonkers. You find yourself in public places, musing to yourself, "Howabout Streetlamp? Or Median? Or Crosswalk?" When all else fails, try some babbling at random. Who knows? You might come up with "Kaazaa." |
About Me Contact Me making money musings process publicity semantic web software Java EE 6 begin again give status daily protect your flow fool your inertia warm up your brain log it and leave it don't break the box sharing hats circumstance arising RDF Intro Angela Talk: a semweb introduction W3C Semantic Web Original Road Map SemanticWeb.org RDF Resource Guide SchemaWeb SUMO Full Article Index February 2011 July 2010 May 2010 January 2010 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 August 2008 June 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 March 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 August 2005 July 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 link to this site
![]()
|
||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
"Big Fractal Tangle" is a phrase used by Tim Berners-Lee at ISWC 2003
to describe his vision of the Semantic Web (used with permission) "Tidepool" and "Storymill" are trademarks of Immuexa Corporation. Website design copyright © 2003-2004 by Immuexa. |
|||||||